Cameron Jay Ortis, convicted under Canada’s Security of Information Act, has been granted day parole for community preparation under conditions including a nightly curfew.
The Story
A former RCMP intelligence official convicted of breaching Canada’s secrets law has been granted day parole, a Parole Board of Canada decision that allows him to spend daylight hours in the community while returning to a designated location each evening to prepare for his eventual full return to society.
The Parole Board approved day parole for Cameron Jay Ortis, 54, following his November 2023 conviction under the Security of Information Act. Records show the board approved specific conditions for the arrangement and that Ortis was previously sentenced to 14 years in prison in early 2024 for multiple counts related to the unlawful handling of classified information.
Ortis has an adjusted timeline of remaining custody that reflected time already served: he had seven years and 155 days left to serve when sentenced. He later received day parole at a separate location—described in the records as likely a private residence—for a six-month period beginning in February, including a nightly curfew.
Late last month, the parole board granted a six-month extension of that day parole arrangement. Day parole generally permits offenders to take part in community-based activities during the day, subject to restrictions, while requiring them to return each evening to the location specified by the board.
The conviction stemmed from actions connected to Ortis’s work with secret information at the RCMP. The records describe that Ortis led an RCMP group that assembled sensitive information related to cybercriminals, terror cells and transnational criminal networks. At trial, a picture emerged of his background and lifestyle, including testimony that he was an avid runner and had kept his personal life private.
Ortis pleaded not guilty to the charges. Court records summarized in the decision material indicate he was found guilty of three counts of violating the Security of Information Act and one count of attempting to do so, as well as breach of trust and fraudulent use of a computer system. The charges related to allegations that he disclosed classified information to individuals of interest to police in 2015 and attempted to do so in a fourth instance.
In testimony during the trial, Ortis said he did not betray the RCMP and claimed he offered secret material in an effort to persuade targets to use an online encryption service set up by an allied intelligence agency to spy on adversaries. The Crown’s position, as reflected in the summary of the case, was that Ortis lacked authority to disclose classified material and was not acting as part of a legitimate undercover operation, while also not being able to pinpoint a motive.
When sentencing Ortis, Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Maranger said Ortis’s role placed him in a position of “extreme trust” and that his actions could have put lives at risk. The sentencing record also said the conduct undermined Canada’s international reputation in the intelligence community.
Ortis’s legal process has continued. The materials state that Ortis is appealing his conviction and sentence and that the Crown is appealing the length of his sentence. He was granted bail in 2024 but chose to remain in custody while the appeal process proceeds.
In the day parole record, the Parole Board concluded that Ortis’s “risk to reoffend can be safely managed.” The February record states the board viewed the offending as occurring within a “very specific set of circumstances” tied to his past employment, circumstances the board said were unlikely to recur. It also noted there was no information indicating additional criminal involvement.
The board’s conditions include a prohibition on communicating with known criminals, restrictions on the use of internet-connected devices, and regular reporting of financial transactions. The record also reflects that at the start of the sentence Ortis maintained he believed he had authority to share the information, while later acknowledging and understanding that he did not have that authority and that he should have consulted others and gathered more information before making such decisions.
The parole board said Ortis expressed regret and acknowledged the negative impact of his actions. It also noted support letters submitted for the record, describing that it had received letters from family members and others willing to support him in the community, with letters consistently attesting to his character and the kind of support they were prepared to provide.
According to the decision materials, Ortis planned to take part in an online technology program while preparing for a specialized position in the electrical field. The records also say that while incarcerated he completed an apprenticeship program for electricians and an environmental operators certification program that enabled him to work at an institution’s wastewater treatment plant.
The decision materials further include an account of opposition to community release. A parole decision record from August states that the board received a letter in March from one of Ortis’s former colleagues who opposed his community release, saying the colleague felt Ortis had not taken accountability and had failed to truly represent his intentions regarding the offences.
The Parole Board’s day parole decision means Ortis will continue to operate under strict reporting and communications limits as he completes community-based preparation, including programming steps toward employment plans in the electrical field, before any further eligibility for broader release is considered.
Scope: National, Local: false, International: false
Scope: National
scope check
← More stories