Defence Minister David McGuinty says examining extreme, low-probability military risks is routine and should not be read as a policy shift after Prime Minister Mark Carney’s comments to the New York Times.
The Story
Defence Minister David McGuinty sought to reduce concern after Prime Minister Mark Carney said Ottawa has examined the possibility of U.S.-led military action in Canada, arguing that militaries routinely assess a wide range of risks. The remarks come about a day after Carney’s comments to the New York Times.
McGuinty said the analysis of potential military scenarios is normal for any country and that the government will not provide details on what any such examination involved. He characterized the government’s position as one of preparedness rather than indication of an intention to pursue action, adding that further specifics would not be forthcoming.
The exchange follows Carney’s indication in an interview with the New York Times that it would be “irresponsible” not to prepare for “extreme tail risk.” Carney declined to discuss in detail what Ottawa’s assessment would have entailed.
McGuinty emphasized the longstanding nature of the Canada–United States defence relationship, saying the two countries share one of the world’s most important military partnerships and have worked together for decades to help keep North America safe. His comments framed the issue as part of routine planning within an alliance context.
The Conservative Party is pushing for additional clarity from both the Canadian government and the United States. Conservative MP Ellis Ross said Carney’s comments were irresponsible and “uncalled for,” arguing they could stoke division and fear, and he said he wants to know what the U.S. has to say about the matter.
← More stories