A vote to stop installing Stolpersteine Holocaust remembrance plaques in Heidenau has sparked a backlash amid far-right and conservative support for the move.
The Story
The town council in Heidenau, a community of about 16,000 people southeast of Dresden in eastern Germany, voted Thursday to end the laying of Stolpersteine memorial plaques—small, engraved brass markers placed in sidewalks near the homes where victims of Nazism once lived.
The decision halts the practice of installing the palm-sized “stumbling blocks,” created by German artist Gunter Demnig, that bear names and fates of Jews and others persecuted by the Nazi regime. The plaques are designed to encourage passersby to read the inscriptions as they go about everyday routines.
Heidenau’s vote follows a broader pattern of debate across Germany about how best to commemorate the Holocaust. Stolpersteine, which first began with a 1992 installation in Cologne, have since spread widely: more than 126,000 plaques exist in over 30 countries, marking the victims of Nazi persecution, including among the approximately six million Jews killed during the Holocaust.
The city council action drew particular attention because it was supported by members of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) and by councillors from Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU). Those backing the move argued that many relatives of Holocaust victims regard Stolpersteine as an inappropriate form of remembrance, in part because people can walk on the plaques.
Critics described the Heidenau decision as an attack on Germany’s remembrance culture. Schleswig-Holstein’s state commissioner for political education, Christian Meyer-Heidemann, said the vote amounted to “a deliberate attack on our culture of remembrance,” according to comments attributed to him to the German news agency dpa.
Israel has also condemned the step. Israel’s ambassador to Germany, Ron Prosor, said he was “ashamed” and added that some plaques in Berlin commemorated members of his own family. Prosor wrote on the social platform X that a city council in 2026 decided to stop installing new Stolpersteine.
For many people, the engraved plaques function as an accessible, public form of memorial. They have also drawn visitors who travel to Germany specifically to attend Stolpersteine ceremonies, including to remember victims who were gassed in Nazi concentration camps. In that context, the plaques are often seen as the closest thing to a grave or a burial for individuals whose deaths occurred during the Holocaust.
Heidenau’s action is not isolated. Munich does not permit Stolpersteine to be laid on city-owned land and has instead used other forms of memorialization. Some Jewish leaders in Munich have said they object to the alternatives on the grounds that they also allow victims’ names to be trampled.
The broader controversy is occurring as the far-right AfD gains influence in parts of Germany. The party has been riding momentum from recent electoral successes in two states, and polls cited in reporting indicate it is now the most popular party in Germany. Germany’s domestic intelligence agency has classified the AfD as extremist in some regions.
Merz, the CDU leader, has rejected cooperation with the AfD. The AfD has faced criticism for downplaying Nazi-era crimes that, observers say, continue to shape Germany’s politics and public mindset after World War II.
Gunter Demnig, the artist who created Stolpersteine, warned against what he described as abandonment of historical responsibility by mainstream conservative forces. He was quoted by dpa as saying the outcome was expected after AfD’s electoral successes, and he accused the CDU of “leaving their Christian roots behind.”
The controversy in Heidenau illustrates how municipal decisions can become symbolic flashpoints in debates over Holocaust memory, public space, and political legitimacy—especially when far-right figures align with mainstream parties at the local level. For communities that have come to view Stolpersteine as a tangible, permanent remembrance, the interruption of new installations raises questions about how future commemorations will be handled in towns where the practice is curtailed.
← More stories